<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The New England School of Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nestheology.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nestheology.org</link>
	<description>Offering multi-site academic Christian instruction for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:58:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Scientific Method is Not Alone</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/05/16/the-scientific-method-is-not-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/05/16/the-scientific-method-is-not-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  In this final installment of investigating the claims of science, we arrive at a most under evaluated topic &#8211; the scientific method.  Most textbooks in science such as chemistry and physics pay a kind of homage to the “scientific method” &#8211; &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/05/16/the-scientific-method-is-not-alone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/05/16/the-scientific-method-is-not-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientific Claims and Explanations</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/08/scientific-claims-and-explanations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/08/scientific-claims-and-explanations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The artwork shown is somewhat strange looking.  What is it trying to communicate? (see below)  Scientists routinely deal with strange phenomenon and offer some kind of explanation for it.  When a scientist makes a claim such as “science shows that &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/08/scientific-claims-and-explanations/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/08/scientific-claims-and-explanations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are All Scientific Claims Trustworthy? Let the Buyer Beware</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/06/are-all-scientific-claims-trustworthy-let-the-buyer-beware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/06/are-all-scientific-claims-trustworthy-let-the-buyer-beware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last time we looked at the claim “science shows that God does not exist”.  The author perhaps implies that all of science or scientists agree but popular polls suggest otherwise.  Why do many scientists in our modern-day still hang onto &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/06/are-all-scientific-claims-trustworthy-let-the-buyer-beware/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/06/are-all-scientific-claims-trustworthy-let-the-buyer-beware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Song of Science?</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/01/the-song-of-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/01/the-song-of-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the book, God: The Failed Hypothesis. How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist by Victor J Stenger a variety of findings are presented to support the title claim.  If true, believers ought to run for cover for their &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/01/the-song-of-science/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/03/01/the-song-of-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Veiled World of Informational Molecules and the Origin of Life</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/02/15/the-veiled-world-of-informational-molecules-and-the-origin-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/02/15/the-veiled-world-of-informational-molecules-and-the-origin-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last time we investigated chance formation of informational objects such as sentences from randomly selected words.  The odds of making a meaningful sentence are quite low as calculations suggest.  The lesson helps us to begin appraisal of the claim that &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/02/15/the-veiled-world-of-informational-molecules-and-the-origin-of-life/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/02/15/the-veiled-world-of-informational-molecules-and-the-origin-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Chances of Information</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/21/the-chances-of-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/21/the-chances-of-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can a sequence of symbols that carry a message be the product of chance?  How random are rolls of dice (shown in the picture)?  These are deep philosophical and mathematical questions.  A general survey of these questions helps us to &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/21/the-chances-of-information/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/21/the-chances-of-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information Ain&#8217;t Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/17/information-aint-cheap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/17/information-aint-cheap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the claims of several militant atheists God does not exist and more particularly God is not needed to account for the existence of the universe and all life. One critic, Richard Dawkins cites the naturalistic hypothesis of evolution &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/17/information-aint-cheap/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/17/information-aint-cheap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Most Improbable Mountain?</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/09/a-most-improbable-mountain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/09/a-most-improbable-mountain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; God is indeed in the crosshairs of a growing number of atheists.  At least one concept that challenges the “God hypothesis” is philosophical materialism, which holds that nature alone and its chemical and physical processes produced life.  A “Creator” &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/09/a-most-improbable-mountain/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/09/a-most-improbable-mountain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God in the Crosshairs: Does God Exist?</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/08/god-in-the-crosshairs-does-god-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/08/god-in-the-crosshairs-does-god-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 18:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. DeMassa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do you believe what you believe about God?  ‘Well, I just do’, some respond.  Equally short answers follow the question; Does God exist? &#8216;Sure!&#8217; Perhaps there was a time when responses such as these might pacify the average inquisitor &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/08/god-in-the-crosshairs-does-god-exist/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2013/01/08/god-in-the-crosshairs-does-god-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting beyond the warm and cozy Christmas of modernity to the real Christmas</title>
		<link>http://www.nestheology.org/2012/12/18/getting-beyond-the-warm-and-cozy-christmas-of-modernity-to-the-real-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nestheology.org/2012/12/18/getting-beyond-the-warm-and-cozy-christmas-of-modernity-to-the-real-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 06:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chip M. Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nestheology.org/?p=2371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We underestimate our unbelieving neighbors and friends. We dismiss the possibility that, in their own way, they might actually be seriously seeking answers—ultimate answers about life, faith, and death. Often, it is our particular version of Christianity that is rejected &#8230; <a href="http://www.nestheology.org/2012/12/18/getting-beyond-the-warm-and-cozy-christmas-of-modernity-to-the-real-christmas/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nestheology.org/2012/12/18/getting-beyond-the-warm-and-cozy-christmas-of-modernity-to-the-real-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
